Smaller and smaller

For a very long time now we have understood the difference between “nominal” and “finished” sizes. A 2×4 has not been two inches by four inches for many years now. And we have all pretty much accepted the explanation that the dimension “2×4” refers to the size at which the wood was sawn and that after “surfacing” it would be somewhat less than two inches by four inches.

What seems to be open to speculation and interpretation is just how much less “somewhat less” actually is. At one point it was in the neighborhood of 1-3/4″ x 3-3/4″, which seemed fairly reasonable because knocking off an eighth of an inch per side could be considered a justified trade off against the possibility of having to make a second pass. But over the years, it seems that lumber has gotten smaller and smaller, much like Snickers bars or the contents of bags of M&Ms without any really good explanation.

Today, a 2×4 can be as small as 1-3/8″ x 3-3/8″. Unless you can convince me that infeed rollers have gotten much more aggressive at chewing up wood, necessitating the removal of ever more material to yield a clean surface, I can only conclude that lumber is being cut smaller and smaller. Understandable, if you are thinking in terms of conservation and yield.

But what about sheet goods? Plywood and other engineered sheet goods are still being manufactured at 4×8. But now it seems that the thicknesses are shrinking. As with many things, over the last 20 years, we have come to understand that most of our sheet goods have been imported. And we also have understood that imported sheets are most likely sized to metric thicknesses. So a sheet of 1/4″ plywood will not be 1/4″ thick but 5mm. We even have “special” 5mm groovers for this imported material. But domestic sheets have still been 1/4″ even though the core has mostly morphed from veneer core to MDF. But it was still 1/4″.

But, now we are getting sheets that are neither 1/4″ or 5mm thick. We are seeing 3/4″ plywood sheets that are consistently running as much as a sixteenth of an inch under 3/4″. Since this material is not subject to the same milling loss as solid stock, it is difficult to see how this can be explained. The only possible conclusion we can draw is that the manufacturers are trying to cut a few hundredths of a cent off of every sheet in order to boost profits. But I wonder where it will end.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Terms of Use.