The riving knife

Since the mid 1980’s, virtually every table saw sold in this country has been equipped with some kind of “splitter”, a stationary metal blade intended to hold the kerf open behind the blade. The splitter has also done double duty as a convenient mounting place for the ineffective but required blade guards that have long come with every table saw. In truth, the splitter has rarely functioned as a decent safety device because, for the most part, they have been made of flimsy metal of a thickness far less than that of a typical saw blade.

And since the standard splitter/blade guard combo is mostly in the way and completely obstructing to the normal operation of the machine, they mostly end up tossed under the saw where they are later swept up and disposed of along with the rest of the shop fall down.

But as of the end of this year, all table saws sold in America will be required to have a true riving knife. The safety function of a riving knife is the same, at least in theory, as that of a splitter – it prevents the kerf from closing behind the blade on a rip, or allowing the stock that may bind between the blade and fence from getting caught by the teeth on the back of the blade. Even though the riving knife and the splitter are similar, the differences between them are significant.

Probably most significant is the fact that since the riving knife doesn’t need to be removed from the saw when cross-cutting or doing a blind (non-through) cut (since it doesn’t extend above the top of the saw blade) it actually has a decent chance of being left on the machine by the operator. Like a splitter, a riving knife is mounted on the same mechanism that mounts the blade, allowing it to move with the saw blade as it’s raised, lowered and tilted. But it sits closer to the back edge of the blade, making it much more effective since there is less space for the stock to shift into the path of the blade. It also provides some additional protection for the operator by blocking contact with the back edge of the blade.

All in all, this represents a significant breakthrough in table saw safety. Even though the riving knife is an extremely simple device and should cost no more than a few dollars per machine to implement, saw manufacturers have fought against this requirement for years. Why? Probably because by producing saws equipped with riving knives that will not sell for significantly more than those previously sold without, their arguments against incorporating these simple safety devices will be badly perforated. Also, this is seen by many as the first step toward more stringent safety requirements like the inclusion of something similar to the braking technology used on the SawStop machines. That one has manufacturers worried.



  • I’ve often wondered why manufacturers of table saws most often sold in America refused to incorporate riving knives. Surely the dollar or two that would be added to the manufacturing cost would be worth the significant safety advantage. European saws have enjoyed this feature for many years. Seems to me that if the manufacturers commonly targeting the American market had adopted this technology voluntarily, it would not be getting “forced” upon them now.

    But, that’s just me.

  • Joe Dusel says:

    First off, I have a few books on hand that tell me that a “riving knife” is a “splitter”. To rive means to split. Splitters have been around for a long time, and it’s been way longer than just the 80s. The splitters that track the blade and are adjusted to be very close to the blade are not a new invention either. I’ve seen pictures of American table saws from the early 1900s that had what appeared to be the type of splitter that tracks the blade. I have heard that the reason the American companies started using the fixed splitter was all about keeping the costs of the machine down. That seems believable to me.

    It always amazes me when I go into a shop and they have removed their splitter and guard from the table saw. It’s spectacularly stupid when it’s a commercial shop with employees. I’ve even seen shops with European machines that come with decent splitters and guards discard these essential safety devices. Can you imagine the kickback that a 10 HP saw can generate? Not to mention the danger of a hand going into a blade when a kickback occurs.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Terms of Use.